« Back to Thread View

Displaying (5) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art

�強 自然語言的 �功應� 如果��能僅�賴語法�則而�功 則該�則書就必須詳列�種�能的 情� occasion 使房屋內的外國人�以根據與其談話內容相關的 情� 之正確觀察 來判斷��一個��時的正確應答方� 說得更具體一點 沒有任何 純粹的語法�則書 能夠教人正確地回答 今天是晴天嗎 這個�題 因為�正確地回答這個�題 必須�賴回答者�當時 情� 也就是天氣如何 的�知 而這個�知就超越的 語法 的範� 也就是說 當Searle設計這個�想實驗時 將中文房間設計�一個 �以�功以自然語言�通 的房間時 他已經把這些 ��功�通而言 必� 的語�內容的元素 �渡進他那 應該�是純粹關於語法�則 的�則書裡 然而 一當我們把這個被�渡的元素看清楚之後 關於這個房間�中文的 �解 就變得更接近一般的 �解 情� 如果 整個中文房間 的 中文功能 是建立在 �則書 �與談話內容相應的情�的正確觀察 以� 語言輸入�輸出的管� 之上 那麼這個 中文房間 �功使用中文的形� 與我們�一個中文使用者使用中文的形�是相當接近的 也就是說 這 整個中文房間 的�解和我們一般的�解是差�多的 因此 Searle想�引誘出的那個直覺就��真的那麼直覺了 除�他能�供一套說法 來說明一個缺� �語義內容�出 無論有�識還是無�識的 判斷 之能力的系統 如何能夠僅�賴語法�則就能進行 �功的自然語言�通

By: | Oct 12, 2015 | Report Comment

There aultacly is aultacly a difference amongst the Democratic base of guidance, the universe of non-Federal taxpayers, and the demographics of dependency. And it may make the atmospherics no rosier if this extremely wealthy guy was throwing out class resentment (versus the poor) to hype up a room comprehensive of self-righteous plutocrats. Moreover, having thrown section of his very own base under the bus (there are loads of people just receiving by, some with governmental support who have been enthusiastic backers of Romney), he has doubled down on the original error. Repeating above and over that *of course* people who you should not pay out Federal taxes would not assist lower marginal rates for upper earners. Other than we all know folks who exactly match that category who did. And suggests he nevertheless would not get it. And so the argument shifts from the debate on the lifestyle of dependency vs a culture of independence, self-respect, as well as the work ethos, into the significantly considerably less sellable personalized mark-down edition in the argument, the protest with the givers against the takers which happens to be sorta like the very first argument but crucially different, rather than to the better.

By: | Oct 11, 2015 | Report Comment

Wow! Great thinnikg! JK

By: | Jan 02, 2015 | Report Comment

There atalculy is atalculy a difference amongst the Democratic base of guidance, the universe of non-Federal taxpayers, and the demographics of dependency. And it may make the atmospherics no rosier if this extremely wealthy guy was throwing out class resentment (versus the poor) to hype up a room comprehensive of self-righteous plutocrats. Moreover, having thrown section of his very own base under the bus (there are loads of people just receiving by, some with governmental support who have been enthusiastic backers of Romney), he has doubled down on the original error. Repeating above and over that *of course* people who you should not pay out Federal taxes would not assist lower marginal rates for upper earners. Other than we all know folks who exactly match that category who did. And suggests he nevertheless would not get it. And so the argument shifts from the debate on the lifestyle of dependency vs a culture of independence, self-respect, as well as the work ethos, into the significantly considerably less sellable personalized mark-down edition in the argument, the protest with the givers against the takers which happens to be sorta like the very first argument but crucially different, rather than to the better.

By: | May 28, 2014 | Report Comment

RE: An event such as the Osceola mudflow (6000 years ago) would otabterlie Tacoma, Puyallup, and most of Renton Whoa- green jobs, rising home values, and a tourist attraction to boot! I think we have a winner. And really, who is going to miss Tacoma, Puyallup, or Renton? Win, Win, Win!My apologies to those who are going to be buried under tons of mud, but hey, in the new Amerika we all need to do our part Rate this comment: 0 0

By: | May 27, 2014 | Report Comment

wacky_stripes

margaretzabor

• Make Products
• View Thread
• Add this Artwork to My Favorites
• Share this artwork with a friend!

There are 11 pieces of art in this thread

• 

Comment On This Piece