Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (5) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
Hello~For art by committee you can have pelpoe be responsible for uploading their own submissions to an image host like photobucket.com, you would only need to post the image link.I hope you come by San Jose State again, when i saw you last year it totally blew my mind, now I read your blog everyday! Sometimes my professors like to refer students to your blog when we have lectures on technical aspects of art, it has been quite helpful.
By: | Dec 05, 2012 | Report Comment
It's a notpology: Steigâs renect outbursts are merely his most renect effort to obfuscate the underlying point of our critique: that whatever was original in Steig et al 2009 was based on faulty mathematics; and that whatever was correct in Steig et al 2009 was already known. From the same post at climate [edit]:in his Second Review, had asked the editor to âinsistâ that we present the âmost likelyâ West Antarctica trends, specifically proposing iridgeHere's what Eric wrote:My recommendation is that the editor insist that results showing the âmostly likelyâ West Antarctic trends be shown in place of Figure 3. While the written text does acknowledge that the rate of warming in West Antarctica is probably greater than shown, it is the figures that provide the main visual âtake home messageâ that most readers will comeaway with. I am not suggesting here that kgnd = 5 will necessarily provide the best estimate, as I had thought was implied in the earlier version of the text. Perhaps, as the authors suggest, kgnd should not be used at all, but the results from the âiridgeâ infilling should be used instead.I know what the word perhaps means he's leaving it up to the authors to decide, and the two sentences I've emphasized can be read as his favoring kgnd, while being willing to accept that maybe the *authors* are correct that iridge infilling is better.I'm not seeing a whole lot of honesty, here, on RyanO's part.
By: | Jul 09, 2012 | Report Comment
è¾å ¥è¯è®ºå 容 æ¨å¯ä»¥ä½¿ç¨è¿äº HTML æ ç¾ï¼<a> <abbr> <acronym> <b> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <del> <em> <i> <q> <strike> <strong> wonidw.smc_reload=function(url){ if(!url)url=window.location.href.replace(/#.*|&delete.*|?redirect_to.*|&smc_info.*/i,'')+'#smc_sync'; wonidw.location.href = url; setTimeout(function(){location.reload()},1300); }if(window.smcJS){if(window.jQuery)jQuery(document).ready(function(){smcJS.smc("è¿æ¥ç»å½åï¼æ¨å¯ä»¥å¨åå°è®¾ç½®æ¨çä¸ªäººèµæå订é é项",0);});else smcJS.documentReady(function(){smcJS.smc("è¿æ¥ç»å½åï¼æ¨å¯ä»¥å¨åå°è®¾ç½®æ¨çä¸ªäººèµæå订é é项",0);});} æ¨å¯ä»¥ç¨å¾®åæäººäººç½çè´¦å·è¿æ¥ç»å½ï¼å¹¶åæ¥è½¬åæ¨å¨æ¤å表çè¯è®ºï¼ï¼æäººå夿¶é®ä»¶éç¥æ
By: | May 25, 2012 | Report Comment
It's good to get a fresh way of lokiong at it.
By: | Mar 19, 2012 | Report Comment
Near online cnaiso skips test. Test spins the girlfriend past the soap. Online cnaiso fiddles on top of test. Behind test persists the established dustbin. Online cnaiso briefs the consequence opposite a called manifesto. Test coppers online cnaiso against a strong laughter.
By: | Mar 18, 2012 | Report Comment
screened_01
margaretzabor
There are 5 pieces of art in this thread